what we do

We have specialization to provide advisory services on complex statutory Compliance and policy-related matters under areas of Logistics (Import & Export), Taxation (GST & Customs), Foreign Trade & Investment (DGFT), Food Safety (FSSAI), Weights & Measures (Legal Metrology), Wireless & Telecommunication Products (WPC) and Chartered Engineering services. Optimize your Supply chain as 4PL Company through our 3PL partners. Refund of duty/ credit/interest at Customs, GST and DGFT Appellate Service related to Customs, GST and Legal Metrology. Licenses and IEC from DGFT.

Friday, October 23, 2015

Arrest -in cases where the evasion of Central Excise duty or Service Tax or the misuse of Cenvat Credit is equal to or more than rupees one crore

Circular No. 1010/17/2015-CX
F. No. 96/54/2014-CX.1
Government of India
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise & Customs
New Delhi
New Delhi, the 23rd October, 2015
All Principal Chief/Chief Commissioners of Central Excise & Customs,
All Principal Chief/Chief Commissioners of Central Excise,
All Principal Chief/Chief Commissioners of Service Tax,
All Principal Director/Directors General.

Sir/Madam,
Sub: Revised monetary limits for arrest in Central Excise and Service Tax - reg.
         Kind attention is invited to circular number 1009/16/2015-CX dated 23.10.2015 on the subject of prosecution under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax cases). Revised monetary limits have been prescribed in the circular for launching prosecution. Prosecution can now be launched where evasion of Central Excise duty or Service Tax or misuse of Cenvat Credit in relation to offences specified under sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or sub-section (1) of section 89 of the Finance Act, 1994  is rupees one crore or more.
2.     Consequently, it has been decided to revise the limits for arrests in Central Excise and Service tax. Henceforth, arrest of a person in relation to offences specified under clause (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or under clause (i) or (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 89 of the Finance Act, 1994, may be made in cases where the evasion of Central Excise duty or Service Tax or the misuse of Cenvat Credit is equal to or more than rupees one crore. Central Excise circular no. 974/08/2013-CX and Service Tax circular no. 171/6 /2013-ST both dated 17-7-2015 stand amended accordingly.   
3.      Difficulty if any, in the implementation of the circular should be brought to the notice of the Board. Hindi version would follow.
            Yours faithfully,  


(ROHAN)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India

Friday, October 16, 2015

#EaseofDoingBusiness Electronic Delivery Orders will reduce transaction cost and time

Electronic messaging,electronic invoicing & e-Payment facilities will reduce transaction cost& time

Circular No. 24 /2015- Customs
F.No. 450/226/2014- Cus IV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs
New Delhi, Dated: 14.10.2015
To
All Chief Commissioner of Customs / Customs (Preventive)
All Chief Commissioners of Customs and Central Excise
All Commissioners of Customs
All Commissioners of Customs and Central Excise
Sir / Madam,

Subject: Improving Ease of Doing Business – Issuance of Electronic Delivery Orders -regarding

As part of Government's initiatives for improving “Ease of Doing Business”, several facilitation measures are being taken by the Central Board of Excise & Customs. After consultation with stakeholders, it has emerged that introduction of electronic messaging for issue of Delivery Order instead of a paper based Delivery Order will result in considerable simplification in the Customs Clearance process, and can demonstrably reduce transaction costs and time taken in the clearance of Cargo. The use of electronic Delivery Orders was also identified at the first Central Customs Clearance Facilitation Commitee meeting held on 28 July 2015 as an important trade facilitation measure.

2. Before Importers or their Customs Brokers are allowed to pick up their import cargo, they are required to pay the Shipping Line/Airline or Consol Agent, the freight and Delivery Order Charges (or D.O. charges). Once these charges are collected, the latter will in turn send to the Custodian the Delivery Order while also advising the importer or the Customs Broker of the issuance of the Delivery Order.

3. Traditionally, Airline and Shipping Lines have allowed the pick-up of import cargo by conveying a paper-based Delivery Order in a format acceptable to the Custodian. The importer or his Customs Broker visits the counter of the Shipping Line/Airline or Consol Agent, pays the ‘D.O. Charges, collects a paper copy of the Delivery Order, and hand carries it to the office of the Custodian. Recently, however, steps have been taken by some Shipping Lines and Airlines in co-operation with Custodians to provide the Delivery Order electronically in mutually agreed formats, allowing the entire process to be completed electronically, without the importer or his Customs Broker having to visit either office.

4. To implement the electronic Delivery Order System, as a prerequisite, the Custodian should have the technical capability to implement an electronic messaging system for the receipt of electronic Delivery Order. Shipping Lines, Airlines and Consol Agents should have the capacity to generate electronic Delivery Order in the required format.

5. Apart from the above prerequisites, it will facilitate trade if Shipping Lines, Airlines and Consol Agents can adopt a system of electronic invoicing of all charges along with the facility to conclude the payment process using e-Payment facilities. It is only then that the importer or his Customs Broker can avoid the mandatory personal visit to the office/counter of the Shipping Line/ Airline or Consol Agent.

6. The introduction of electronic Delivery Order or electronic Payment of D.O. Charges do not change any of the current Customs procedures. Besides, all other procedures followed by the Custodians, i.e., due diligence involved in the verification of the Delivery Orders, obtaining 'Out of Charge' from Customs, and issuance of 'Gate Pass', etc will continue.

7. In respect of some categories of imports, namely - unaccompanied baggage, Direct Delivery, and one-time individual importers, the Shipping Line/ Airline may retain manual (i.e. paper copy) of the Delivery Order, if desired. Further, if for technical reasons, in case of any failure of the system of electronic transfer of Delivery Order, the concerned Shipping Line/ Airline or Consol Agent may issue manual Delivery Order, as a purely temporary measure, in order to avoid any difficulty or delay in clearance of imported goods.

8. It is expected that elimination of hard-copy Delivery Order and implementation of the proposed online system of Delivery Order would enable Shipping Lines, Airlines and Consol Agents to issue Delivery Order at the earliest possible time in the process of unloading of cargo.

9. Secure electronic transmission of Delivery Order would enhance the overall security and transparency of the cargo clearance process. Custodians and carriers should ensure smooth implementation of this trade-friendly measure, while ensuring that no difficulty is faced by any importer (or their authorized representative) in obtaining Delivery Orders or completing any other formalities for clearance of goods.

10. To encourage the implementation of electronic Delivery Order, Chief Commissioners of Customs may play the role of facilitators with the help of forums such as the CCFC. Commissioner of Customs, Air Cargo Complex, Sahar, had adopted a two-stage process to implement the scheme. In the first stage, a Public Notice was issued inviting members of the Trade to participate in trials, followed by another Public Notice for the full scale launch. The relevant Public Notices 05/2015 and 09/2015 may be found on Commissioner of Customs ACC, Sahar’s website http://www.accmumbai.gov.in/aircargo/miscellaneous/pn_2015_16.html# .

11. All Customs formations may take necessary steps to bring the stakeholders together in order to encourage the implementation of electronic transmission of Delivery Orders.

12. Difficulty faced, if any, may be brought to the notice of the Board at an early date.
Yours faithfully
(A.K.Sapra)
OSD (Customs IV)

#ServiceTax #IndianBank #MoneyTransferServiceOperators (MTSO) No service tax for foreign remittance into India

No service tax to be paid by Indian bank or agents to MTSO for foreign remittance of foreign currency from outside India to India for the period commencing on and from the 1st day of July, 2012 and ending with the 13th day of October, 2014 .
Full text  is below:-
[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)]

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs

Notification No. 19/2015-Service Tax

New Delhi, the 14th October, 2015
22 Asvina 1937 Saka

G.S.R. (E).- Whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that in the period commencing on and from the 1st day of July, 2012 and ending with the 13th day of October, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the said period) according to a practice that was generally prevalent, there was  non–levy of service tax on the services provided by an Indian Bank or other entity acting as an agent to the Money Transfer Service Operators (hereinafter referred to as MTSO),  in relation to remittance of foreign currency from outside India to India (hereinafter referred to as the said practice),  and this service was liable to service tax, which was not being paid according to the said practice.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) as made applicable to like matters in Service Tax vide section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby directs that the service tax payable under section 66B of the Finance Act, 1994, on the service provided by an Indian Bank or other entity acting as an agent to the MTSO in relation to remittance of foreign currency from outside India to India, in the said period, but for the said practice, shall not be required to be paid.

 (Himani Bhayana)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
[F.No. 137/51/2014-Service Tax]

New #CustomsPort at #Tirupati, place of lord Venkata

[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)]
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Excise and Customs)

Notification No. 99/2015-Customs (N.T.)

New Delhi, the 15th October, 2015
         G.S.R. …..(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of  section 7 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 61/94-Customs (N.T.), dated the 21st November, 1994, published in the Gazette of India, vide number S.O. 828 (E), dated the 21st November, 1994, namely:-
         In the said notification, in the Table, against the serial number 2 relating to the State of Andhra Pradesh, in columns (3) and (4), for item (c) and the entries relating thereto in column (4), the following shall respectively be substituted, namely :-     
(3)(4)
“(c) TirupatiUnloading of imported goods or loading of export goods or any class of such goods.” 

[F.No.520/26/2015-Cus-VI]

(Anurag Sehgal)
 Under Secretary to the Government of India

Note.-  The principal notification No.61/94-Customs (N.T.) dated the 21st  November,  1994 was published vide number S.O. 828 (E), dated the 21st November, 1994 and was last amended by notification No. 54/2014-Customs (N.T.) dated 21st July, 2014 vide number S.O. 1876(E) dated the 21st July, 2014.  

#gold #silver #cbec New Tariff value for Gold , SIlver,Crude Palm Oil ,Brass Scrap (all grades) Poppy seeds

[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART-II, SECTION-3, SUB-SECTION (ii)]
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
(Central Board of Excise and Customs)

 

Notification  No.100/2015-CUSTOMS (N. T.)


New Delhi, 15th  October, 2015

23 Asvina, 1937 (SAKA)

S.O. … (E).– In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise & Customs, being satisfied that it is necessary and expedient so to do, hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 36/2001-Customs (N.T.), dated the 3rd August, 2001, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section (ii), vide number S. O. 748 (E), dated the 3rd August, 2001, namely:-

In the said notification, for TABLE-1, TABLE-2, and TABLE-3 the following Tables shall be substituted namely:-

 

“TABLE-1

Sl. No.Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff itemDescription of goodsTariff value US $
(Per Metric Tonne)
(1)(2)(3)(4)
11511 10 00Crude Palm Oil573
21511 90 10RBD Palm Oil612
31511 90 90Others – Palm Oil593
41511 10 00Crude Palmolein625
51511 90 20RBD Palmolein628
61511 90 90Others – Palmolein627
71507 10 00Crude Soya bean Oil705
87404 00 22Brass Scrap (all grades)3072
91207 91 00Poppy seeds2648
Contd…2/…

-:2:-

TABLE-2
Sl. No.Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff itemDescription of goodsTariff value
(US $)
(1)(2)(3)(4)
171 or 98Gold, in any form, in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 321 and 323 of the Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed382 per 10 grams
271 or 98Silver, in any form, in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 322 and 324 of the Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed518 per kilogram 
TABLE-3
Sl. No.Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff itemDescription of goodsTariff value
(US $ Per Metric Tons )
(1)(2)(3)(4)
1080280Areca nuts2662”

                                                [F. No. 467/01/2015 -Cus-V ]




(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India

Note: - The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section (ii), vide Notification No. 36/2001–Customs (N.T.), dated the 3rd August, 2001, vide number S. O. 748 (E), dated the 3rd August, 2001 and was last amended vide Notification No. 96/2015-Customs (N.T.), dated the 30th September, 2015, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section (ii), vide number  S. O. 2674(E), dated 30th September, 2015.




New Circular for Second Hand Machinery (Circular No. 25 /2015 ,dated 15th October 2015)


Circular No. 25 /2015                                                            15th October 2015
F. No. 467/34/2006-Cus.V
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise & Customs                                                                                        


All Principal Chief Commissioners
All Chief Commissioners of Customs,
All Chief Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise,
All Directorate-Generals, Chief Departmental Representative,
All Principal Commissioners of Customs,
All Principal Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise
All Commissioners of Customs
All Commissioners of Customs & Central & Excise

Sir,

Subject: Valuation of second hand machinery –regarding


The Board has received representations from other Ministries, trade bodies and traders
regarding issues arising from the interpretation of Board's circular no. 4/2008 - Cus dated 12th
February 2008. The circular requires that field formations rely upon a chartered engineer's inspection
report while valuing imports of second hand machinery and that inspection/appraisement reports
issued at the port of loading should be accepted. The circular also states that there is no need to
specify the agencies whose certificates alone would be accepted. It has been ascertained from
field formations that the present practice in this regard is that if an importer produces a chartered
engineer's appraisement report issued at the load port, with the ingredients indicated in para 8 (a) of
the circular 4/2008-Cus, the same is being accepted by Custom Houses. Also, appraisement /
inspection reports prepared by pre-shipment inspection agencies in India, which have been notified
by DGFT, are also being accepted by the Custom Houses. However, if the report produced by the
importer does not contain information mandated in the circular 4/2008-Cus dated 12th
 February 2008, the importer is advised to select any chartered engineer, empaneled by the Custom House, for  inspection / appraisement of the second hand machinery. In this regard, consultations have also been held with DGFT, DIPP, Trade Associations (Oil, FICCI, ASSOCHAM, BCHAA and others)
2. After due consideration of the suggestions and concerns put forth the Board has decided to
issue the following guidelines for valuation of imports of second hand machinery:
3. Where used second hand machinery is sold for export to India and the sale meets all of the
requirements set out in Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules 2007,
the price paid or payable for the goods is to be used as the basis for determining the assessable
value.
4. However, it is frequently the case that as part of an arrangement, separate from the contract
of sale, the second hand machineries are reconditioned, refurbished, modernized, or otherwise
improved prior to their importation into India. In such situations, there is a change in the condition of
the goods brought about prior to their importation. Similarly, other costs such pre-shipment
inspection, dismantling and crating charges may be incurred by the buyer after the sale of the goods.
Costs of all such elements need to be determined for the purpose of arriving at the value under
section 14 of the Customs Act. Thus, there may be instances where the requirements of Rule 3 of
the Valuation Rules are not met, in which case, the value for imposition of duty must be determined
under one of the subsequent methods of valuation applied in sequential order.
5. In view of the nature of goods, there may be certain difficulties in applying Rule 4 or 5 of the
CVR, 2007. These difficulties arise from the fact that the goods being valued are used second hand
machinery, and it may be difficult to find data relating to sales of such goods to India, which could be
considered identical or similar and meet all the requirements of Rule 4 and 5 of the CVR, 2007
6. Similarly, application of Rule 7 of CVR, 2007 where under goods being appraised are valued
on the basis of subsequent sales of identical or similar goods in India, may also not be possible
because the goods being appraised are imported for use rather than for resale. The difficulty of
finding such sales of goods which could be considered identical or similar to the goods being
appraised, may preclude the application of this method.
7. Under Rule 8 of the CVR, 2007, goods are valued using the computed value method which
is based, among other things on the cost of production of the goods being appraised plus an amount
for profit and general expenses. However, since used capital goods are not manufactured as such,
viz, as old and used machinery, it is not possible to calculate assessable value based upon the cost
of production.
8. It follows that in cases where used capital goods cannot be appraised under Rule 3, and
where there may be difficulty in applying Rules 4 to 8 of the CVR, 2007, the proper officer may be
required to apply the residual method under Rule 9 so as to factor condition, depreciation,
refurbishment, charges of disassembly & packing and any expenses incurred by way of pre-shipment
inspection agency charges etc
9. Given the nature of challenges in computing the value of second hand machinery under Rule 9 and the need to ensure that the approach applied reflects commercial reality and results in a value
which is fair, and is arrived through uniform processes by all custom houses, it is felt that it is
necessary to obtain inspection I appraisement reports from qualified neutral parties.
10. For this purpose, the Board has decided that Inspection I Appraisement Reports issued by
Chartered Engineers, or their equivalent, based in the country of sale of the second hand machinery
shall be accepted by all Custom Houses. For the purposes of uniformity, the format in which
inspection/appraisement reports shall be prepared by the Chartered Engineer is annexed to this
circular. In the event that an importer does not produce an inspection/appraisement report in the
prescribed format from the country of sale, he shall be free to engage the services of inspection
agencies notified as per HBoP 2015-20. In case the agencies notified in the HBoP not being at the
port of import, the importers will be free to select any Chartered Engineer from those empaneled by
the Custom House of the port of import.
11. No Custom House shall require any importer to have an inspection I appraisement report of
second hand machinery from a particular Chartered Engineer. The importer shall be free to select
any chartered engineer, empaneled by the Custom House for the respective class of goods, if so
required.
12. To sum up, the following guidelines shall be followed:
a). All imports of second hand machinery I used capital goods shall be ordinarily
accompanied by an inspection I appraisement report issued by an overseas
chartered engineer or equivalent, prepared upon examination of the goods at the
place of sale.
b). The report of the chartered engineer or equivalent should be as per the Form A
annexed to this circular.
c). In the event of the importer failing to procure an overseas report of inspection I
appraisement of the goods, he may have the goods inspected by any one of the
agencies in India, as are notified by the DGFT under Appendix 2G of the HBoP 2015-
20 and Aayat Niryat Forms to FTP 2015-20, as amended from time to time (para 2.59
of Handbook of Procedures 2015-20 refers).
d). At customs stations where agencies notified by DGFT are not present, importers
may continue to avail of the services of locally empaneled chartered engineers.
e). In cases where the report is to be prepared by the agencies in India notified by
DGFT or the chartered engineers empaneled by Custom Houses the same shall be
in the Form B annexed to this circular.
f). The value declared by the importer shall be examined with respect to the report of
the chartered engineer Similarly, the declared value shall be examined with respect
to the depreciated va,ue of the goods determined in terms of the circular No.
493/124/86-Cus VI dated 19/11/1987 and dated 4/1/1988. If such comparison does
not create any doubt regarding the declared value of the goods, the same may be
appraised under rule 3 of the CVR, 2007. If there are significant differences arising
from such comparison, Rule 12 of the CVR, 2007 requires that the proper officer shall
seek an explanation from the importer justifying the declared value. The proper
officer may then evaluate the evidence put forth by the importer and after giving due
consideration to factors such as depreciation, refurbishment or reconditioning (if
any), and condition of the goods, determine whether the declared transaction value
conforms to Rule 3 of CVR, 2007. Otherwise, the proper officer may proceed to
determine the value of the goods, sequentially, in terms of rule 4 to 9.

13. This circular supersedes circular 4/2008-Cus dated 12th  February 2008.
14. Any difficulty in the implementation of the foregoing guidelines may be brought to the notice
of the Board.
Yoursiaithfully,
(S. Kumar)
Commissioner (Cus & EP)
Phone: 011-2309 2080
Fax: 011-2309 4432
Form B
(Refer Pare 12(e) of Circular No. 25/2015 dated 15th
 October 2015
[On the letter Head of the Chartered Engineer/firm if inspection report is issued in India]
I, (name of chartered engineer) hereby certify that I have carried out an inspection of
the used machinery covered jnder invoice no dated issued by
(name of co)as per the details below:-
l/We have visually inspected the second hand machinery/capital goods and certify the following:
(i) Place of Inspection
(ii) Date of Inspection
(iii) Duration of inspection (in hours)
Details of Importer:
(i) Name:
(ii) Address:
(iii) Importer Exporter Code No
Details of the goods:
i. Name of Manufacturer of the machine ( with address/country/tel/website,
if available; in case of multiple machines or a plant, details may be provided in a separate
sheet)
ii. Year of the manufacture of machinery:
iii. Serial no. I ID No. or the manufacturer's plate affixed on the machine:
(please also enclose a photograph)
iv. Description of Machine
v. Whether original invoice relating to the machine is available?
vi. If yes, value currency Date of Invoice (please enclose copy)
vii. If no, please estimate the original sale price of the machinery:
viii. Present condition of machinery and expected lifespan:
(In case the goods being inspected are second hand spares of capital goods, it should be
certified whether "such spares have at least 80% residual life of original spare")
Refer: Para 2.31 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20
(Please attach close up photographs of the machinery; multiple photographs may be
taken, if necessary.)
ix. Has any reconditioning or repairs been carried out immediately preceding this inspection:
YES/No
x. If yes, have these been carried out at the expense of the seller or by the purchaser or a
third party?
xi. Are there invoices to indicate the cost thereof: YES/NO (please enclose relevant invoices)
xii. If No, then estimated cost thereof
xiii. Please briefly describe the nature of repairs and/or refurbishment:
xiv. Were any charges incurred by the purchaser, for dismantling, packing and transporting
the machinery to the port of export? If yes, please indicate the charges
xv. Any catalogues I documentation of the machine are available? If yes, please provide the
details and copies.
(e) The following means/aids/technical reference material have been used for inspecting the
goods:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
I/We hereby declare that the particulars and statements made in this certificate are true and correct..
Date Signature
Seal of th e
Inspecting
Agency
Name of the Inspecting
Person/Inspector
Desig nation
Address (office)
E Mail Address
Phone Number
Instructions:
1. This certificate shall be presented before Indian Customs (by the importer of the second hand
machine(s)) as a part of the import declaration under Customs Act, 1962 , which is a legal
declaration
2. The Chartered Engineer must enclose a copy of the certificate issued by the Institute of
Chartered Engineers which qualifies him to perform such appraisement/inspection
3. Please attach a copy of the relevant notification of DGFT which notifies the firm for Preshipment
Inspection in India (where applicable) Or,
4. Please attach copy of Customs House letter authorising you I your firm as an empanelled
chartered engineer.
Form A
(Refer Para 12(b) of Circular No. 25/2015 dated 15th
 October 2015)
[On the letter head of the Chartered Engineer/Firm or
an equivalent entity in the country of sale]
I, (name of chartered engineer) hereby certify that I have carried out an inspection of
the used machinery covered under invoice no dated issued by
(name of company/firm) as per the details below:-
lA/Ve have visually inspected the second hand machinery/capital goods and certify the following:
(a) (i) Country of Inspection
(ii) Place of Inspection
(iii) Date of Inspection
(iv) Duration of inspection (in hours)
(b) Details of seller:
(i) Name:
(ii) Address:
(iii) Telephone No.
(iv) E-mail
(v) Status: Actual user or dealer
(c) Details of Importer:
(i) Name:
(ii) Address:
(iii) Importer Exporter Code No.
(d) Details of the goods
i. Name of Manufacturer of the machine (with address/country/tel/website,
if available; in case of multiple machines or a plant, details may be provided in a separate
sheet)
ii. Year of the manufacture of machinery:
iii. Serial no. I ID No. or the manufacturer's plate affixed on the machine:
(please also enclose a photograph)
iv. Description of Machine
v. Whether origina invoice of the machine is available?
vi. If yes, value currency Date of Invoice (please enclose copy)
vii. If no, please estimate the original sale price of the machinery,:
viii. Present condition of machinery and expected lifespan:
(In case the goods being inspected are second hand spares of capital goods, it should be
certified whether "such spares have at least 80% residual life of original spare")
Refer: Para 2.31 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20
(Please attach close up photographs of the machinery; multiple photographs may be
taken, if necessary.)
ix. Has any reconditioning or repairs been carried out immediately preceding this inspection:
YES/No
x. If yes, have these been carried out at the expense of the seller or by the purchaser or a
third party?
xi. Are there invoices to indicate the cost thereof: YES/NO (please enclose relevant invoices)
xii. If No, then estimated cost thereof
xiii. Please briefly describe the nature of repairs and/or refurbishment:
xiv. Are there any charges incurred I to be incurred by the purchaser, for dismantling, packing
and transporting the machinery to the port of export? If yes, pi indicate the
charges
xv. Any catalogues I documentation of the machine are available? If yes, please provide the
details and copies.
(e) The following means/aids/technical reference material have been used for inspecting the
goods:
(i).
(iii).
I/We hereby declare that the particulars and statements made in this certificate are true and correct.
Date Signature
Name of the Inspecting
Person/Inspector
Designation
Seal of th e
Inspecting
Agency
Address (office).
E Mail Address_
Phone Number
Instructions:
1. This certificate shall be presented before Indian Customs (by the importer of the second hand
machine(s)) as a part of the import declaration under Customs Act, 1962 , which is a legal
declaration
2. The Chartered Engineer I Chartered Valuer I Qualified Expert must enclose a copy of the
certificate issued by a national body which qualifies him to perform such appraisement/inspection
3. The photograph of the Chartered Engineer I Chartered Valuer I Qualified Expert shall be affixed

to this report

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Refund/Claim of Safeguard Duties as Duty Drawback.

Circular No.  23/2015 – Customs

F.No. 609/88/2015-DBK
Government of India
Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise& Customs

New Delhi, dated 29th September, 2015
To
Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners (All under CBEC)
Principal Directors General / Directors General (All under CBEC)
Principal Commissioners/Commissioners (All under CBEC)

Ma’am/Sir,

Subject:  Refund/Claim of Safeguard Duties as Duty Drawback.
          Attention is invited to the Circular No. 106/95-Cus, dated 11.10.1995 regarding refund/claim of Anti-Dumping Duty leviable under Section 9A of the Custom Tariff Act, 1975 as Duty Drawback 
2.  With respect to Safeguard Duties which are leviable under Section 8B or Section 8C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with Section 12 of the Customs Act, the Board clarifies that these are rebatable as Drawback in terms of Section 75 of the Customs Act. Since Safeguard Duties are not taken into consideration while fixing All Industry Rates of drawback, the drawback of such Safeguard Duties can be claimed under an application for Brand Rate under Rule 6 or Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995. This would necessarily mean that drawback shall be admissible only where the inputs which suffered Safeguard Duties were actually used in the goods exported as confirmed by the verification conducted for fixation of Brand Rate.
3.  Where imported goods subject to Safeguard Duties are exported out of the country as such, then the Drawback payable under Section 74 of the Customs Act would also include the incidence of Safeguard Duties as part of total duties paid, subject to fulfilment of other conditions.
4. Suitable Public Notice for information of Trade and Standing Orders for the guidance of staff may be issued.         

Get rid of worries related to demand , refund , releasing of seized books of accounts & assessts


For mor details , pl go this link http://www.cbec.gov.in/resources//htdocs-cbec/ombudsman-guidelines.pdf;jsessionid=FA7AAFBDC089EB7599E933C8BE6EA05B

The Indirect Tax Ombudsman Guidelines 2011
The Guidelines are introduced with the objective of enabling the resolution of
complaints relating to public grievances against the Customs, Central Excise and
Service Tax Department and to facilitate the satisfaction or settlement of such
complaints.
CHAPTER I
PRELIMINARY
1. Short title, commencement, extent and application
I. These Guidelines shall be known as the Indirect Tax Ombudsman
Guidelines, 2011.
II. They shall come into force from 11th May, 2011.
2. Definitions
I. ‘authorized representative’ means a person duly appointed and
authorized by a complainant to act on his behalf and represent him in the
proceedings under these guidelines for consideration of his complaint.
II. ‘award’ means an award passed by the Ombudsman in accordance with
these Guidelines.
III. ‘complaint’ means a representation in writing or through electronic means
containing an administrative grievance alleging deficiency in the working of
the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Department as mentioned in
clause 9 of the Guidelines.
IV. ‘guidelines’ means The Indirect Tax Ombudsman Guidelines, 2011.
V. ‘Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax authority complained
against’ means the junior-most Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax
officer not below the rank of a Superintendent of Central Excise, or an
Appraiser of Customs or a Superintendent of Customs who has given the
cause of grievance to the complainant. If the grievance has been caused by
an official lower in rank than a Superintendent of Central Excise or an
Appraiser of Customs or a Superintendent of Customs, then this term shall
mean the officer in the rank Superintendent of Central Excise or an
Appraiser of Customs or a Superintendent of Customs who is in-charge of
such official.
VI. ‘Ombudsman’ means any person appointed under Clause 3 of these
Guidelines.
CHAPTER II
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OFFICE OF INDIRECT TAX OMBUDSMAN
3. Appointment and Tenure
I. On the recommendations of a Committee consisting of the Secretary,
Department of Revenue in the Ministry of Finance, the Chairman,
Central Board of Excise and Customs and the Member (Personnel &
Vigilance), Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), the Central
Government may appoint one or more persons as Ombudsman.
II. The Ombudsman selected shall be a person who has held a post in the
Government of India in the HAG pay scale of ` 67,000 -79,000 on regular
basis for at least one year or in a higher grade and shall preferably be a
resident of the city where he/she is proposed to be appointed. He/she
shall be a serving officer (as on the last date for receipt of applications )
preferably of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise).
If a suitable officer from that service is not available, officers of equivalent
grade of any other group „A‟ service of the Central Government may be
appointed as Ombudsman. When appointed as Ombudsman, the officer,
if he/she is still in service under the Government of India, shall seek
retirement from Government service before entering upon his office as an
Indirect Tax Ombudsman.
III. The Ombudsman shall be independent of the jurisdiction of the Customs,
Central Excise and Service Tax department.
IV. The Ombudsman shall be appointed for a tenure of 2 years extendable
by one year based on performance appraisal or till the incumbent attains the
age of 63 years, whichever is earlier. There shall be no reappointment.
Performance appraisal shall be made by the Committee constituted in clause
3.I.
4. Remuneration
The Ombudsman shall be allowed pay and allowances as applicable to a
Central Government Officer in the HAG+ pay scale of ` 75500-80,000. Any
pension to which he is entitled from the Central Government / State
Government shall be deducted from his salary.
5. Territorial Jurisdiction
The Central Government shall specify the territorial jurisdiction of each
Ombudsman.
6. Location of offices
The offices of Indirect Tax Ombudsman shall be located at Delhi, Mumbai,
Chennai, Kolkata, Bangalore, Ahmedabad and Lucknow.
7. Secretariat
Each Ombudsman shall be provided with an office space of appropriate size
and a secretariat staff consisting of a Private Secretary, Tax Assistant and a
Peon by the Central Board of Excise and Customs.
CHAPTER III
8. Powers and Duties
I. The Ombudsman shall have the powers to –
a) receive complaints from taxpayers on any matters specified in
clause 9;
b) consider such complaints and facilitate their satisfaction or
settlement by agreement, through conciliation and mediation
between the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Department
and the aggrieved parties or by passing an „award‟ in accordance
with the Guidelines;
c) require the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Authority
complained against or any other related Customs, Central Excise
and Service Tax Authority to provide any information or furnish
certified copies of any document relating to the subject matter of the
complaint which is or is alleged to be in its possession; provided
that in the event of failure of such authority to comply with the
requisition without any sufficient cause, the Ombudsman may, if he
deems fit, draw the inference that the information, if provided or
copies if furnished, would be unfavorable to the concerned
Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Authority;
d) suggest remedial measures for redressal of grievances; and
e) report his findings to the Secretary, Department of Revenue,
Government of India and the Chairman CBEC for appropriate action
against erring officials;
f) Ombudsman shall not have any authority over the Central Board of
Excise and Customs and Directorates under Central Board of
Excise and Customs as these are Attached offices of Central Board
of Excise and Customs.
II a) In cases where action is to be taken by the CBEC and the
Directorates under the CBEC which are attached offices of the
CBEC, the Indirect Tax Ombudsman shall only have powers of
recommendation.
b) The Indirect Tax Ombudsman shall not have jurisdiction in cases
where proceedings have been initiated under Conservation of
Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974
and Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1988.
III The Ombudsman shall have the following duties:
a) to exercise general powers of superintendence and control over his
office and be responsible for the conduct of business in his office;
b) to maintain confidentiality of any information or document coming
into his knowledge or possession in the course of discharging his
duties and not to disclose such information or document to any
person except with the consent of the person furnishing such
information or document; provided that nothing in this clause shall
prevent the Ombudsman from disclosing information or documents
furnished by a party in a complaint to the other party or parties, to
the extent considered by him to be reasonably required to comply
with the principles of natural justice and fair play in the
proceedings;
c) to protect individual taxpayer‟s rights;
d) to identify issues that increase the compliance burden or create
problems for taxpayers, and to bring those issues to the attention
of the CBEC and the Ministry of Finance;
e) to send a monthly report to the Chairman, CBEC and Secretary,
Department of Revenue in the Ministry of Finance recommending
appropriate action. The report shall also highlight cases where
action needs to be taken against erring Customs, Central Excise
and Service Tax authorities for their failure to redress the
grievance. The report will be accompanied with primary evidence
needed to initiate action against the delinquent persons;
f) to furnish a report every year containing a general review of
activities of the office of the Ombudsman during the preceding
financial year to the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of
Finance and the Chairman, CBEC along with such other
information as may be considered necessary by him/her. In the
annual report, the Ombudsman, on the basis of grievances
handled by him, will review the quality of the working of the
Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Department and make
recommendations to improve the indirect tax administration; and
g) to compile a list of „awards‟ passed by it between April and March
of each financial year in respect of every Customs, Central Excise
and Service Tax Authority complained against, by name, and
report it to the controlling Chief Commissioners of the officers
concerned and the Chairman, Central Board of Excise and
Customs before the end of April so that this information can be
reflected in the Annual Confidential Reports of the officers
concerned.
CHAPTER IV
PROCEDURE FOR REDRESSAL OF GRIEVANCE
9. Grounds on which complaint shall be filed:-
I. A complaint on any one or more of the following grounds alleging
deficiency in the working of the Customs, Central Excise and
Service Tax Department may be filed with the Ombudsman:
(a) delay in the issue of refunds or rebate beyond time limits
prescribed by law or under the relevant instructions issued from
time to time by the Central Board of Excise and Customs;
(b) delay in adjudication;
(c) delay in registration of tax payers;
(d) delay in giving effect to Appellate orders;
(e) non adherence to the principle of “ First Come First Served” in
sending refunds;
(f) non adherence to the rules prescribed for disbursement of
drawback;
(g) non acknowledgement of letters or documents sent to the
department;
(h) delay in release of seized books of account and assets, after
the proceedings under the Customs, Central Excise and
Service Tax statutes in respect of the years for which the books
of account or other documents are relevant are completed;
(i) non adherence to prescribed working hours by Customs,
Central Excise and Service Tax officials;
(j) unwarranted rude behaviour of Customs, Central Excise and
Service Tax officials with assessees;
(k) any other matter relating to violation of the administrative
instructions and circulars issued by the Central Board of Excise
and Customs in relation to Customs, Central Excise and
Service Tax administration.
Provided that, if on any of the grounds above, the responsibility
for taking action is with the Central Board of Excise and
Customs or on a Centralized authority eg., {Director General
(Systems) }, then the Ombudsman shall not have the power to
pass an award as specified in para 13 below. In such cases,
the decision of the Ombudsman shall be recommendatory in
nature and shall be forwarded in writing to the Revenue
Secretary or the Chairman, CBEC or the centralized authority,
as the case may be.
II Central Board of Excise and Customs may include any other ground
on which a complaint may be filed with the Ombudsman.
10. Procedure for filing the complaint
I. Any person, who has a grievance against the Customs, Central
Excise & Service Tax Department under the Government of India‟s
Department of Revenue, may, himself or through his authorized
representative, if any, make a complaint against the concerned
Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax official in writing to the
Ombudsman having jurisdiction over that office.
II.
a. The complaint shall be duly signed by the complainant or his
authorized representative, if any, and shall clearly state the
complainant‟s name and address, the name of the office and official
of the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax office against whom
the complaint is made, the facts giving rise to the complaint
supported by documents, if any, relied on by the complainant and the
relief sought from the Ombudsman;
b. A complaint made through electronic means shall also be accepted
by the Ombudsman and a print out of such complaint shall be taken
on the record of the Ombudsman;
c. A printout of the complaint made through electronic means shall be
signed by the complainant at the earliest possible opportunity before
the Ombudsman takes steps for conciliation or settlement.
d. The signed printout shall be deemed to be the complaint and it shall
relate back to the date on which the complaint was made through
electronic means.
 III No complaint to the Ombudsman shall lie unless:-
(a) the complainant had, before making a complaint to the Ombudsman,
made a written representation to the Grievance Cell of the concerned
Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax office and did not receive
any reply within one month from the date of its receipt by the
Grievance Cell.
(b) where the complainant had made a complaint in writing to the
Grievance Cell of the concerned indirect tax office and he is not
satisfied with the reply given to him.
(c) where the complainant had before making a complaint to the
Ombudsman, made a written representation to the Customs, Central
Excise and Service Tax authority superior to the one complained
against and either such authority had rejected the complaint or the
complainant had not received any reply within a period of one month
after such authority had received his representation or the
complainant is not satisfied with the reply given to him by such
authority;
(d) the complaint is made not later than one year after the complainant
has received the reply of the concerned Customs, Central Excise and
Service Tax office to his representation or, in case, where no reply is
received, not later than one year and one month after the
representation to the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax
Authority;
(e) the complaint is not in respect of the same subject matter which was
settled through the Office of the Ombudsman in any previous
proceedings whether or not received from the same complainant or
any one or more of the parties concerned with the subject matter; and
(f) the complaint is not frivolous or vexatious in nature.
IV. No Complainant shall be made to the Indirect tax Ombudsman on an
issue which has been or is the subject matter of any proceeding in an
appeal, revision, reference or writ before any Customs, Central
Excise and Service Tax Authority or Appellate Authority or Court.
11. Proceedings to be summary in nature
 The Ombudsman shall not be bound by any legal rules of evidence
and may follow such procedure that appears to him to be fair and
proper. The proceedings before the Ombudsman shall be summary in
nature.
12. Settlement of complaints by agreement
I. As soon as it may be practicable so to do, the Ombudsman shall
cause a notice of the receipt of any complaint along with a copy of the
complaint to be sent to the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax
Authority Complained Against and endeavour to promote a
settlement of the complaint by agreement between the complainant
and such authority through conciliation or mediation;
II. For the purpose of promoting a settlement of the complaint, the
Ombudsman may follow such procedure as he may consider
appropriate.
13. Award by the Ombudsman
I. If a complaint is not settled by agreement within a period of one month
from the date of receipt of the complaint or such further period as the
Ombudsman may consider necessary, he may, subject to the proviso
in para 9.I ante, pass an award after allowing the parties a
reasonable opportunity to present their case. He shall be guided by
the evidence placed before him by the parties, the principles of
Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax law and practice,
directions, circulars, instructions and guidelines issued by the Central
Board of Excise and Customs or the Central Government from time to
time and such other factors which in his opinion are necessary in the
interest of justice.
II. The „award‟ passed under sub-clause (1) above shall be a speaking
order comprising of the following:
a) Directions to the concerned Customs, Central Excise and Service
Tax Authority on performance of its obligations like expediting
delayed matters, giving reasons for decisions/orders and issuing
apology to complainants etc., except a direction affecting the
quantum of tax assessment or imposition of penalties under the
Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax statutes;.
b) A token compensation amount not exceeding ` 5000/-(Rupees
Five Thousand only) for the loss suffered by the complainant.
c) Designation of the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax
officer to whom the letter of acceptance of the award is to be
communicated as detailed in clause 13.4.
III A copy of the „award‟ shall be sent to the complainant and the
Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Authority complained
against.
IV The „award‟ shall be binding on the concerned Customs, Central
Excise and Service Tax office as well as on the complainant provided
that an award shall not be binding on the Customs, Central Excise and
Service Tax office unless the complainant furnishes to it, within a
period of 15 days from the date or receipt of a copy of the award, a
letter of acceptance of the award in full and final settlement of his
complaint. If the complainant does not accept the Award passed by the
Ombudsman or fails to furnish his letter of acceptance of within the
said period of 15 days or within such time, not exceeding a period of 15
days or within such time, not exceeding a period of 15 days that may
be granted by the Ombudsman, the award shall lapse and be of no
effect.
V Any token compensation given as a part of the award shall be paid by
the concerned Customs, Central Excise and Service tax office out of
the budget allocated under the head „Office Expenses‟ of the office of
the concerned Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Authority
complained against. Such payments shall take priority over any other
expenditure from this allocation.
 VI The Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Authority complained
against shall, within one month from the date of the award, comply with
the award and intimate compliance to the Ombudsman.
CHAPTER V
MISCELLANEOUS
14 Removal of difficulties
If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of these
Guidelines, the Central Government may make such provisions not
inconsistent with the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax
statutes or the Guidelines as it appears to it to be necessary or
expedient for removing the difficulty.

Thursday, September 24, 2015

First time IIT Delhi breaks into Top 200 QS world ranking 2015/16

This is first time any IIT breaks into Top 200 in QS world ranking . IIT Delhi is placed 179th in the ranking.

Tuesday, September 08, 2015

Mandatory documents required for import of goods into India as per new Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20

Mandatory documents required for import of goods into India

1. Bill of Lading / Airway Bill / Lorry Receipt / Railway Receipt / Postal Receipt.

 2. Commercial Invoice cum Packing List*

 3. Bill of Entry

[Note:* (i) As per CBEC Circular No. 01/15-Customs dated 12/01/2015. (ii) Separate Commercial Invoice and Packing List would also be accepted.]

Government of India
Ministry of Commerce and Industry
Department of Commerce Directorate General of Foreign Trade

Notification No.08 /2015-2020 New Delhi, 4 th June , 2015

( Source:http://dgft.gov.in/Exim/2000/NOT/NOT15/note-08.15.pdf )

Mandatory documents required for export of goods from India

  Mandatory documents required for export of goods from India:

      1. Bill of Lading/ Airway Bill / Lorry Receipt / Railway Receipt / Postal Receipt.

      2. Commercial Invoice cum Packing List*

      3. Shipping Bill/Bill of Export.

[Note:* (i) As per CBEC Circular No. 01/15-Customs dated 12/01/2015. (ii) Separate Commercial Invoice and Packing List would also be accepted.]

  Refer , DGFT Notification No.08 /2015-2020, New Delhi, 4 th June , 2015

   http://dgft.gov.in/Exim/2000/NOT/NOT15/note-08.15.pdf



google analytics

newAD

LinkShare  Referral  Prg
drugstore.com, inc.
Google
The Right Gift at the Right Price